Different trades require different evidence. A prompt-crude question should not be forced into the same layout as an LNG-weather question.
Build around the market question—not a fixed vendor layout.
The builder uses the same component registry as the primary dashboards, so a saved workspace can combine price, physical, positioning, model, and thesis evidence.
Which evidence should stay together for the decision I am monitoring?
Start simple. Keep the professional context.
Every screen preserves the instrument, period, unit, source, and limitation while explaining why the evidence matters.
Identify the observation before interpreting it.
Read the instrument, unit, timestamp, period, and source first. A weekly stock estimate and a five-minute futures quote answer different questions.
Compare level, change, and historical context.
The current value matters less without its direction of travel, seasonal baseline, related markets, and the catalyst that moved expectations.
Demand cross-source confirmation and preserve uncertainty.
Treat every dataset as evidence with a release lag, methodology, revision risk, and known blind spots. The workflow should be reproducible after the fact.
What each component means—and how a desk reads it.
Definitions stay plain enough to learn from, while the desk read preserves the mechanism, cadence, and source a professional user expects.
Component registry
The builder exposes the same maintained cards and charts used in Enerlytics' primary dashboards.
A component is a live view with its own query, methodology, empty state, and entitlement—not a decorative placeholder.
- Cadence
- Updates with the component's underlying source
- Source
- Enerlytics dashboard registry
Market templates
Starting layouts group evidence for crude, natural gas, freight, and cross-market questions.
Templates reduce setup time while leaving the user responsible for removing evidence that does not answer the current question.
- Cadence
- Versioned with product releases
- Source
- Enerlytics workflow templates
Persistent layout
Card selection, sizing, order, filters, and dashboard identity are saved for later sessions.
Persistence turns a one-off screen into a repeatable monitoring process and warns before unsaved edits are abandoned.
- Cadence
- Saved on user action
- Source
- Account-scoped dashboard configuration
Shared date and market context
Compatible components can be aligned to the same commodity, date range, or observation window.
Alignment reduces accidental comparisons between a live quote, a weekly release, and a differently dated physical estimate.
- Cadence
- Interactive
- Source
- Component-level metadata
The evidence underneath the screen.
- Market Pulse and candle charts
- WTI, Brent, and natural-gas curve history
- EIA, Cushing, storage, and balance cards
- Freight, AIS, LNG shipping, and CFTC
- Model Signal and Market Thesis components
Method before conclusion.
- 01
Preserves each component’s own methodology
- 02
Supports market-specific layouts and filters
- 03
Keeps saved dashboards connected to live data rather than screenshots
Evidence moves through a workflow.
- 01Choose a market question
- 02Add relevant evidence
- 03Arrange the workflow
- 04Save
- 05Revisit as conditions change
Adding more cards does not automatically improve a decision. The strongest dashboard is selective and tied to a clear question.
Build around one decision question
A useful custom dashboard is a deliberate evidence set, not the maximum number of available cards.
- 1
Name the question
For example: Is prompt WTI tightness broadening into the physical market?
- 2
Choose evidence
Add price, M1-M2, Cushing, refinery runs, freight, and crude-on-water—not unrelated gas cards.
- 3
Order the logic
Place observation first, confirmation second, and monitoring or invalidation last.
- 4
Save and revisit
Return to the same layout as each source updates.
Trust comes from showing the seams.
One registry, consistent semantics
Builder components reuse the product's existing source labels, freshness rules, units, and explanations so a saved dashboard does not invent a second interpretation layer.
Enerlytics links the underlying methodology so customers can distinguish a product interpretation from the source definition.
A real Enerlytics workflow—not a conceptual mockup.

See the evidence used in a real market conversation.
Enerlytics publishes weekly market recaps, component explainers, and thesis walkthroughs. For Dashboard Builder, the recurring desk question is: Which compact dashboard best recreates the evidence sequence used in this week's market recap?
Put this evidence inside the full decision workflow.
Start with a free trial. Review the data, methodology, related evidence, and limitations before making your own market decision.
Start free trial