Why a trader cares
Positioning can influence persistence and squeeze risk, but the weekly report is context—not a precise timing tool.
Data & AnalyticsCFTC Positioning
Market participationLive
See whether speculative participation is supportive, stretched, or unwinding.
CFTC Positioning provides a shared crude-oil and natural-gas view of managed-money exposure and historical context.
Question answered
Is managed money adding to, reducing, or crowding the current market view?
Built for more than one level of market experience
Start simple. Keep the professional context.
Every screen preserves the instrument, period, unit, source, and limitation while explaining why the evidence matters.
Start here01
Identify the observation before interpreting it.
Read the instrument, unit, timestamp, period, and source first. A weekly stock estimate and a five-minute futures quote answer different questions.
Desk read02
Compare level, change, and historical context.
The current value matters less without its direction of travel, seasonal baseline, related markets, and the catalyst that moved expectations.
Professional use03
Demand cross-source confirmation and preserve uncertainty.
Treat every dataset as evidence with a release lag, methodology, revision risk, and known blind spots. The workflow should be reproducible after the fact.
Component guide
What each component means—and how a desk reads it.
Definitions stay plain enough to learn from, while the desk read preserves the mechanism, cadence, and source a professional user expects.
Managed-money longs and shorts
In plain English
Gross long and short futures positions held by traders classified as money managers in the CFTC Disaggregated COT report.
Professional read
A net change can come from new longs, short covering, long liquidation, or new shorts. Those mechanisms carry different persistence and squeeze implications.
- Cadence
- Weekly; Tuesday positions normally published Friday
- Source
- CFTC Disaggregated COT, futures only
Net position
In plain English
Gross managed-money longs minus gross managed-money shorts.
Professional read
Net exposure summarizes direction but hides the gross behavior that created it, so inspect long and short series together.
- Cadence
- Weekly
- Source
- CFTC
Net share of open interest
In plain English
Net managed-money exposure scaled by total market open interest.
Professional read
Scaling helps compare positioning across periods when the size of the futures market changed.
- Cadence
- Weekly
- Source
- CFTC
Weekly and four-week change
In plain English
Short- and medium-window changes measure whether speculative exposure is accumulating or unwinding.
Professional read
Price rising with net exposure increasing is different from a rally driven primarily by short covering.
- Cadence
- Weekly
- Source
- Derived from CFTC reports
Percentile and crowding
In plain English
The current net position is ranked against two years of its own history and standardized with a crowding measure.
Professional read
An extreme identifies asymmetry and squeeze or liquidation risk; it is context, not an automatic contrarian trade.
- Cadence
- Weekly
- Source
- Enerlytics historical analytics
What data it uses
The evidence underneath the screen.
- Managed-money long and short positions
- Net position and weekly change
- Open interest and net percent of open interest
- Four-week change
- Two-year percentile and crowded-position measures
How Enerlytics interprets it
Method before conclusion.
- 01
Separates gross long and short behavior
- 02
Compares the current net position with its own history
- 03
Flags extremes without automatically reversing the market view
How it connects
Evidence moves through a workflow.
- 01Current exposure
- 02Weekly and four-week change
- 03Historical percentile
- 04Price and curve context
- 05Thesis participation
What not to infer
CFTC data is weekly and lagged. Extreme positioning can persist and should not be treated as an automatic contrarian entry.
Worked market workflow
Read participation without turning it into a timing signal
The report explains who was positioned as of Tuesday. It does not reveal every participant's motive or what changed after the cutoff.
- 1
Start gross
Determine whether longs, shorts, or both changed.
- 2
Scale
Compare net exposure with open interest and its own history.
- 3
Check pace
Use one-week and four-week change to distinguish a new build from a mature position.
- 4
Confirm
Compare price, curve, and physical evidence before using positioning inside a thesis.
Methodology and limitations
Trust comes from showing the seams.
Classification has meaning and limits
CFTC classifies money managers by business purpose and reporting information. A trader's category can change, and spreading is reported separately from outright long and short exposure.
Release lag remains visible
The screen labels the report date and normal publication timing so a Friday view is not mistaken for live Friday positioning.
Primary references
Enerlytics links the underlying methodology so customers can distinguish a product interpretation from the source definition.
See the product
A real Enerlytics workflow—not a conceptual mockup.
Weekly research, recaps, and video explainers
See the evidence used in a real market conversation.
Enerlytics publishes weekly market recaps, component explainers, and thesis walkthroughs. For CFTC Positioning, the recurring desk question is: Was the week's price move supported by new risk-taking, short covering, or an already crowded position?
Weekly market notes →Written recaps tied to the same evidence workflow.Public signal reviews →Current states with accountability and limitations.Video recaps on X →Short market recaps, chart walkthroughs, and thesis updates.Explainers on Threads →Component education and the reasoning behind each market read.
Use this with
Related guides
Live in Enerlytics
Put this evidence inside the full decision workflow.
Start with a free trial. Review the data, methodology, related evidence, and limitations before making your own market decision.
Start free trial